Implement Stage A: rule engine, validation, audit, and safety gates
Completes 109 of 121 tasks. Every remaining task needs a tenant connection
(T055, T056, T101-T103) or an Azure Automation account (T115-T121).
354 offline Pester tests PASS
Engine purity (Principle IV) PASS
Sanitization (SC-013) PASS (156 files)
Graph module loaded in tests none (SC-008 holds)
What landed
- Four-layer configuration validation with stable finding codes, covering
every VR-002 and VR-003 condition, plus a 23-fixture invalid-config corpus
- Run loop, audit records (NDJSON through a single sink), summaries,
reconciliation, and exit codes 0-6
- Persistence behind a single write-body builder whose result always has
exactly one key
- Invoke-PersonaEngine.ps1 and Edit-PersonaEngineConfig.ps1
- Six docs, two pipelines, traceability matrix, V-5a and sanitization records
Three deviations from tasks.md, each recorded in its status block
T033 is not in Resolve-UserPersona. evaluationErrorThreshold is run-level
state and the rule engine is pure; a counter there would break Principle IV.
It lives in New-PersonaRunCounter and is applied in the run loop.
A new src/Engine/ layer holds Invoke-PersonaEngineRun. The entry script
imports the manifest, which requires Microsoft.Graph.Authentication, so a
loop living only inside it could not run on a machine without the Graph SDK
and SC-004 could not be proven at all. The entry script is now a thin
wrapper and what ships is what is tested.
The invalid-config corpus is generated by a committed script, with the
generated fixtures committed too, so a reviewer sees the fixture in the diff.
Defects found by running the code, not by reading it
Group and role ID lists were double-wrapped: @(Get-PersonaGroupIdPage ...)
around a comma-returned array collapsed every membership list into one
bogus space-joined entry. That is a silent false non-match, exactly what
FR-013 exists to prevent.
A 403 whose status appears only in the exception message parsed as $null,
which the retry policy treats as a transport error - five requests per
account against a tenant already refusing. Status extraction now falls back
to the message text, bounded to 400-599.
The sanitization scan walked tracked files only, so it covered 34 of 156
files and none of this phase's code. It now scans untracked non-ignored
files too, and a negative control confirms it catches a planted leak.
Test-Json reports one error per violating location, not first-failure-only
as the V-5a draft claimed. Record and pin corrected.
Enforcement remains blocked on the V-4 security sign-off.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
||||
#Requires -Modules @{ ModuleName = 'Pester'; ModuleVersion = '5.0.0' }
|
||||
|
||||
<#
|
||||
SC-005: every write body has exactly one key, equal to engine.targetAttribute.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the assertion that bounds the blast radius. OTD-003 records that Graph
|
||||
application permissions have no per-property scope: whatever this engine can write
|
||||
to the persona attribute, it could equally write to any other user property. The
|
||||
directory will not stop a body with a second key, so this test is the thing that
|
||||
does.
|
||||
#>
|
||||
|
||||
BeforeAll {
|
||||
$repoRoot = Split-Path (Split-Path $PSScriptRoot -Parent) -Parent
|
||||
. (Join-Path $repoRoot 'tests/TestHelpers.ps1')
|
||||
foreach ($file in (Get-PersonaSourceFile -RepoRoot $repoRoot)) { . $file }
|
||||
|
||||
$script:target = 'extension_<EXTENSION-APP-ID>_<PERSONA>'
|
||||
$script:approved = @($script:target)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Describe 'Write body construction (SC-005)' -Tag 'Safety' {
|
||||
|
||||
It 'produces a body with exactly one key' {
|
||||
$body = New-PersonaWriteBody -AttributeName $target -Value 'Employee' `
|
||||
-TargetAttribute $target -ApprovedWritableAttributes $approved
|
||||
|
||||
$body.Count | Should -Be 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
It 'names that key exactly the target attribute' {
|
||||
$body = New-PersonaWriteBody -AttributeName $target -Value 'Employee' `
|
||||
-TargetAttribute $target -ApprovedWritableAttributes $approved
|
||||
|
||||
@($body.Keys)[0] | Should -BeExactly $target
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
It 'carries the calculated value unchanged' {
|
||||
$body = New-PersonaWriteBody -AttributeName $target -Value 'Tier0-Admin' `
|
||||
-TargetAttribute $target -ApprovedWritableAttributes $approved
|
||||
|
||||
$body[$target] | Should -BeExactly 'Tier0-Admin'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
It 'permits an empty value, which clears the attribute' {
|
||||
# Clearing is a legitimate outcome when a rule set stops matching an account.
|
||||
# It must go through the same single-key path as any other write.
|
||||
$body = New-PersonaWriteBody -AttributeName $target -Value '' `
|
||||
-TargetAttribute $target -ApprovedWritableAttributes $approved
|
||||
|
||||
$body.Count | Should -Be 1
|
||||
$body[$target] | Should -Be ''
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Describe 'Every body issued during a run has exactly one key' -Tag 'Safety' {
|
||||
|
||||
It 'holds across a full enforcing population' {
|
||||
# The unit test above proves the builder is correct. This proves the run loop
|
||||
# actually uses it, on every account, with no other path to a PATCH.
|
||||
$script:captured = [System.Collections.Generic.List[object]]::new()
|
||||
|
||||
Mock Write-Host { }
|
||||
Mock Get-PersonaUsers { @(New-TestPopulation -Count 20 -TargetAttribute $script:target) }
|
||||
Mock Invoke-PersonaGraphRequest {
|
||||
if ($Method -eq 'PATCH') { $script:captured.Add($Body) }
|
||||
@{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
$outcome = Invoke-PersonaEngineRun `
|
||||
-Configuration (New-TestRuntimeConfiguration -TargetAttribute $script:target) `
|
||||
-TargetAttribute $script:target -Context (New-TestAuditContext -Mode 'Enforce') `
|
||||
-IsEnforcing -ShouldProcessGate { param($t, $d) $true }
|
||||
|
||||
$script:captured.Count | Should -BeGreaterThan 0
|
||||
$script:captured.Count | Should -Be $outcome.Counters.Updated
|
||||
|
||||
foreach ($body in $script:captured) {
|
||||
$body.Count | Should -Be 1
|
||||
@($body.Keys)[0] | Should -BeExactly $script:target
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
It 'issues a PATCH and nothing else as a write method' {
|
||||
$script:methods = [System.Collections.Generic.List[string]]::new()
|
||||
|
||||
Mock Write-Host { }
|
||||
Mock Get-PersonaUsers { @(New-TestPopulation -Count 10 -TargetAttribute $script:target) }
|
||||
Mock Invoke-PersonaGraphRequest {
|
||||
$script:methods.Add($Method)
|
||||
@{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
$null = Invoke-PersonaEngineRun `
|
||||
-Configuration (New-TestRuntimeConfiguration -TargetAttribute $script:target) `
|
||||
-TargetAttribute $script:target -Context (New-TestAuditContext -Mode 'Enforce') `
|
||||
-IsEnforcing -ShouldProcessGate { param($t, $d) $true }
|
||||
|
||||
# No PUT and no DELETE: a PUT would replace the whole user object, and there
|
||||
# is no circumstance in which this engine removes one.
|
||||
$script:methods | Should -Not -Contain 'PUT'
|
||||
$script:methods | Should -Not -Contain 'DELETE'
|
||||
$script:methods | Should -Not -Contain 'POST'
|
||||
$script:methods | Should -Contain 'PATCH'
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Describe 'New-PersonaWriteBody is the only construction path' -Tag 'Safety' {
|
||||
|
||||
It 'is the only source file that builds a PATCH body' {
|
||||
# A second construction site would make SC-005 a property of a convention
|
||||
# rather than of a testable function.
|
||||
$sources = Get-ChildItem -Path (Join-Path $repoRoot 'src') -Filter '*.ps1' -Recurse -File
|
||||
|
||||
$offenders = foreach ($file in $sources) {
|
||||
if ($file.Name -eq 'New-PersonaWriteBody.ps1') { continue }
|
||||
|
||||
$text = Get-Content -LiteralPath $file.FullName -Raw
|
||||
if ($text -match "Method\s*=?\s*'PATCH'" -and $text -notmatch 'New-PersonaWriteBody') {
|
||||
# Invoke-PersonaGraphRequest declares PATCH in a ValidateSet; it does
|
||||
# not construct a body.
|
||||
if ($file.Name -ne 'Invoke-PersonaGraphRequest.ps1') { $file.Name }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
$offenders | Should -BeNullOrEmpty
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user