Files
personaEngine2/config/persona-engine.example.json
T
dave cdc6bb33d3 Implement Stage A: rule engine, validation, audit, and safety gates
Completes 109 of 121 tasks. Every remaining task needs a tenant connection
(T055, T056, T101-T103) or an Azure Automation account (T115-T121).

  354 offline Pester tests      PASS
  Engine purity (Principle IV)  PASS
  Sanitization (SC-013)         PASS  (156 files)
  Graph module loaded in tests  none  (SC-008 holds)

What landed
  - Four-layer configuration validation with stable finding codes, covering
    every VR-002 and VR-003 condition, plus a 23-fixture invalid-config corpus
  - Run loop, audit records (NDJSON through a single sink), summaries,
    reconciliation, and exit codes 0-6
  - Persistence behind a single write-body builder whose result always has
    exactly one key
  - Invoke-PersonaEngine.ps1 and Edit-PersonaEngineConfig.ps1
  - Six docs, two pipelines, traceability matrix, V-5a and sanitization records

Three deviations from tasks.md, each recorded in its status block

  T033 is not in Resolve-UserPersona. evaluationErrorThreshold is run-level
  state and the rule engine is pure; a counter there would break Principle IV.
  It lives in New-PersonaRunCounter and is applied in the run loop.

  A new src/Engine/ layer holds Invoke-PersonaEngineRun. The entry script
  imports the manifest, which requires Microsoft.Graph.Authentication, so a
  loop living only inside it could not run on a machine without the Graph SDK
  and SC-004 could not be proven at all. The entry script is now a thin
  wrapper and what ships is what is tested.

  The invalid-config corpus is generated by a committed script, with the
  generated fixtures committed too, so a reviewer sees the fixture in the diff.

Defects found by running the code, not by reading it

  Group and role ID lists were double-wrapped: @(Get-PersonaGroupIdPage ...)
  around a comma-returned array collapsed every membership list into one
  bogus space-joined entry. That is a silent false non-match, exactly what
  FR-013 exists to prevent.

  A 403 whose status appears only in the exception message parsed as $null,
  which the retry policy treats as a transport error - five requests per
  account against a tenant already refusing. Status extraction now falls back
  to the message text, bounded to 400-599.

  The sanitization scan walked tracked files only, so it covered 34 of 156
  files and none of this phase's code. It now scans untracked non-ignored
  files too, and a negative control confirms it catches a planted leak.

  Test-Json reports one error per violating location, not first-failure-only
  as the V-5a draft claimed. Record and pin corrected.

Enforcement remains blocked on the V-4 security sign-off.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 21:48:19 -04:00

231 lines
6.2 KiB
JSON

{
"configVersion": "1.0.0",
"metadata": {
"owner": "<TEAM-NAME>",
"changeReference": "<CHANGE-REFERENCE>",
"description": "Placeholder-only example. Every identifier below is fictional. Real group Object IDs, attribute names, and domains belong in a protected configuration store, never in this repository."
},
"engine": {
"targetAttribute": "extension_<EXTENSION-APP-ID>_<APPROVED-PERSONA-ATTRIBUTE-NAME>",
"approvedWritableAttributes": [
"extension_<EXTENSION-APP-ID>_<APPROVED-PERSONA-ATTRIBUTE-NAME>"
],
"maxConditionDepth": 5,
"summaryInterval": 25,
"defaultMembershipMode": "direct",
"evaluationErrorThreshold": 50
},
"dataSources": {
"groups": {
"enabled": true
},
"roles": {
"enabled": true,
"includeEligible": false
}
},
"logging": {
"destination": "both",
"path": "<LOG-OUTPUT-PATH>",
"traceConditionValues": false
},
"personas": [
"Guest",
"BreakGlass-Admin",
"Tier0-Admin",
"Tier1-Admin",
"Tier2-Admin",
"Restricted-User",
"Test-Account",
"Service-Account",
"Shared-Functional-Account",
"Meeting-Room-Device",
"Employee",
"Contractor",
"Student"
],
"rules": [
{
"id": "RULE-0010-BREAKGLASS",
"name": "Emergency access accounts",
"description": "Emergency access accounts identified by immutable Object ID (RE-009). Evaluated first so no later rule can reclassify them.",
"enabled": true,
"priority": 10,
"persona": "BreakGlass-Admin",
"owner": "<TEAM-NAME>",
"match": {
"operator": "any",
"conditions": [
{
"type": "property",
"property": "AccountObjectId",
"operator": "in",
"values": [
"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001",
"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000002"
]
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "RULE-0020-GUEST",
"name": "Guest accounts",
"description": "Any account whose directory user type is Guest.",
"enabled": true,
"priority": 20,
"persona": "Guest",
"match": {
"operator": "all",
"conditions": [
{
"type": "property",
"property": "UserType",
"operator": "equals",
"value": "Guest"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "RULE-0030-TIER0",
"name": "Tier 0 administrators",
"description": "Members of the Tier 0 administrative group, or holders of a Tier 0 directory role.",
"enabled": true,
"priority": 30,
"persona": "Tier0-Admin",
"match": {
"operator": "any",
"conditions": [
{
"type": "membership",
"operator": "memberOf",
"membershipMode": "transitive",
"groupObjectIds": [
"00000000-0000-0000-0000-0000000000a0"
]
},
{
"type": "role",
"operator": "memberOf",
"roleIds": [
"<TIER0-ROLE-TEMPLATE-ID>"
]
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "RULE-0040-SERVICE",
"name": "Service accounts",
"description": "Non-human accounts identified by naming convention and the service account group. Both must hold, so a naming-convention collision alone cannot classify a person as a service account.",
"enabled": true,
"priority": 40,
"persona": "Service-Account",
"match": {
"operator": "all",
"conditions": [
{
"type": "property",
"property": "UserPrincipalName",
"operator": "startsWith",
"value": "svc-"
},
{
"type": "membership",
"operator": "memberOf",
"groupObjectIds": [
"00000000-0000-0000-0000-0000000000b0"
]
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "RULE-0050-TEST",
"name": "Test accounts",
"description": "Accounts in the test account group, or matching the test naming convention while disabled.",
"enabled": true,
"priority": 50,
"persona": "Test-Account",
"match": {
"operator": "any",
"conditions": [
{
"type": "membership",
"operator": "memberOf",
"groupObjectIds": [
"00000000-0000-0000-0000-0000000000c0"
]
},
{
"operator": "all",
"conditions": [
{
"type": "property",
"property": "UserPrincipalName",
"operator": "startsWith",
"value": "test-"
},
{
"type": "property",
"property": "AccountEnabled",
"operator": "equals",
"value": "False"
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "RULE-0060-CONTRACTOR",
"name": "Contractors",
"description": "Accounts whose company name marks them as external, excluding those already classified by an earlier rule.",
"enabled": true,
"priority": 60,
"persona": "Contractor",
"match": {
"operator": "all",
"conditions": [
{
"type": "property",
"property": "CompanyName",
"operator": "isNotNull"
},
{
"type": "property",
"property": "CompanyName",
"operator": "notEquals",
"value": "<ORGANIZATION-NAME>"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "RULE-0900-EMPLOYEE",
"name": "Employees",
"description": "Default classification for enabled member accounts with a department. Lowest priority so every more specific rule wins first.",
"enabled": true,
"priority": 900,
"persona": "Employee",
"match": {
"operator": "all",
"conditions": [
{
"type": "property",
"property": "UserType",
"operator": "equals",
"value": "Member"
},
{
"type": "property",
"property": "Department",
"operator": "isNotNull"
}
]
}
}
]
}